I was thrilled this past spring to have a story of
mine accepted for inclusion in The Sexy Librarian’s Dirty Thirty Vol. 2.
Recognition is always nice, but to be included in a prestigious anthology among
some of the best-known names in the business goes far beyond simple
affirmation. I was, to say the least, elated. Editor Rose Caraway clearly ‘got’ what I was
trying to do in A Polite Fiction; it’s not a conventional erotic
narrative—I don’t do conventional—and I understood from the start that it would
not be everyone’s cup of love-tea. I submitted the story, confident that the
quality of the writing would be enough to get me in the door, though I was somewhat
doubtful about whether it would be sufficiently sexy to make the final cut.
As an editor, Rose Caraway is gifted with an
extraordinary kind of literary X-ray vision. She has the ability to see
directly to the heart of a story and understand with acute precision what makes
it tick, why it works, or why it doesn’t. This goes along with an aptitude for
perceiving potential in a piece of writing, a talent for recognizing and
identifying that certain inchoate element, that mysterious unarticulated something
that’s lacking in an otherwise interesting, well-written story. She clearly saw
the potential in A Polite Fiction, liked the characters and the
situation, appreciated my use of dialogue, and loved the ending. But Rose also
recognized the story’s most serious weakness: the tale wasn’t steamy enough.
Out of 3000 words, I’d only spared 120 near the end to describe the consummation
of my characters’ relationship.
Ouch!
Being asked to do re-writes is seldom something to
which an author looks forward with enthusiasm; the request always comes at
first as a bit of a gut-punch. But, deep down, I am a problem-solver. I see a
request to do re-writes not as an affront to my ego or a repudiation of my “brilliant
vision”, but as an opportunity. I thrive
on this kind of challenge; I actually love working an editorial problem
insofar as it helps make a good story even better.
A
Polite Fiction is set in the bedroom of a once-famous author, Dorian Hume. Summer, the writer’s young assistant, is helping her aging employer organize his papers. They face each other from opposite ends of a large waterbed
where documents have been unboxed, spread out, and sorted into piles. In the
bottom of a battered file box, Summer discovers an old pen-and-ink portrait of
the author as a young man, and cannot help imagining what it might have been
like to be with him in his heyday. Then Dorian makes a suggestion:
“I wonder,” he began, “would you…”
“Would I…?”
“Sit here?” The discard pile tottered
precariously as he patted the mattress. “Be with me for a while?”
“Oh, Dorian—Mr. Hume—I…I don’t know.”
“I’d like to tell you a story,” he said.
“Please?”
She hesitated.
“We’ve been alone together before.” His voice was a fine oak-barrel-aged
baritone, rich and penetrating—like those eyes, she thought. Summer could not deny her attraction to this man, never
mind their professional relationship or the fact that he was old enough to be
her grandfather…
Summer wonders aloud how Dorian’s wife, Maude,
might react to the knowledge of their being together. Dorian tells about the
sexual adventures he and Maude used to enjoy in their youth, relating the story
with a kind of wistful nostalgia. Then he reveals his true desire:
“It would be nice to know,” Dorian
muttered.
“What?”
“That I still had it in me… That my
words still had power.”
“I don’t understand.” She put the
drawing down. “What are you saying? What are you—”
“Let me tell you a story,” he begged. “Let
me make love to you with my words.”
Summer hesitates, but eventually joins Dorian on
the bed. He whispers the story in her ear—a kind of Lovecraftian gothic tale of
a damsel escaping a tower in which she has been imprisoned "for the sake of her virtue"--arousing Summer with the sound of his voice. I won’t reveal the denouement, but let’s just say these two
characters definitely experience a happy ending…
In going back to do re-writes, I realized that the
story’s lack of erotic impact had less to do with scenario, setting, description
or atmosphere than with the pacing of the narrative. The clue is clearly
there in the synopsis: Summer hesitates… Both characters in the original
version were too unsure, too shy, to make a first move, and so consummation was
constantly being postponed. Not good when you only have 3000 words to work
with, and only so much time to keep the reader engaged.
Pacing in erotica is something we don’t often think
about unless there’s an obvious problem with it. So what makes for effective
pacing? In conventional pornography there’s never any question about whether
people are going to end up having sex. It’s only a matter of how soon. There are
no obstacles to the act, seldom much time required to get into the mood, very little build-up or 'gradually working into it' beforehand, and precious little foreplay when it finally does happen. There's hardly ever anything remotely like internal conflict to distract the characters or delay the
inevitable. In short, there’s no such
thing as dramatic irony in porn. Sure, one of the characters may play coy for a
second or so; there may be a bit of flirtatious forestalling, but everybody
watching the scene knows damned well what’s coming—and if it doesn’t come quickly, they're very likely to demand their money back. When the starlet bats her eyes demurely
and sighs “Gee…I don’t know…” the average viewer is probably shouting “Get on
with it!” at the screen.
It may seem like a contradiction, but in erotica, sex
isn’t always a foregone conclusion, nor is consummation inevitable. Of course
it wouldn't be erotica without a sexual situation, or, at least, an atmosphere conducive to sex.
But erotica also takes the very unpredictability of the human psyche into
account. Where pornography portrays a kind of mechanical function, automatic
once set in motion, erotica elucidates the psychological and emotional variants
that make each encounter unique—and uniquely human.
This uncertainty is part of the excitement in an erotic narrative, the build-up, gradual or swift, of sexual tension, rising states
of desire, the not-always-smooth progression of arousal, crescendo and plateau.
At some point the characters arrive at what I call an erotic cusp, a
point beyond which doubt is banished, the floodgates are opened, and turning back is unthinkable. In submitting my re-writes to Rose, I put it this way:
I wanted to preserve what I see as the
essence of this story; that is, a professional/intellectual relationship
between two very different people who like and admire each other seguing into
something sexual. The pacing has to be such in the beginning that Dorian and
Summer’s eventual getting over this sexual cusp seems natural, and that what
happens afterwards is all the more powerful for feeling inevitable—something
readers believe these characters truly would do.
In a good deal of erotic writing, the ultimate sex
scene takes on the characteristics of a genre set piece. The language describing
the sex act sometimes assumes a loftier, more poetic tone, bordering, too
often, on the purplishly effusive. What’s happening in the scene may not always
be obvious, but it’s torturously clear that the author got carried away. To be
sure, so many otherwise gifted writers fall into a syntactical rut when
it comes to writing sex itself. This is especially evident where the use of
subordinate clauses is concerned: “Doing x, John did y.” or “Jane
did x, y-ing as she moaned in pleasure…” over and over and over
again. Syntax has a significant influence on pacing. To employ a similar
syntax, sentence after sentence, may create an illusion of speed, but usually
only in the writer’s mind. This kind of regular repetition has the ultimate
effect of desensitizing the reader and putting them to sleep, where, instead,
they ought to be propelled deeper into the world of the story, excited to find out
what happens next.
Dialogue and internal monologue may be employed to break up these monotonous patterns. Ultimately, dialogue may be one of the most effective ways to regulate the
pacing of a story. I like the way this little bit of back-and-forth flows along near the beginning of A Polite Fiction:
“I think Maude’s afraid of losing you.”
“Losing me? How?”
“I don’t know. It’s in the way she talks
about you.”
“What has she said?” The question was
more polite than pointed.
“She said that you were a great man—”
“Were?”
“Are.”
“Mm. And?”
“And
that it’s a privilege to be a part of your world. She told me I should feel
honored to…” Summer paused again, uncertain.
“Honored to…?”
“…be the object of your interest, of your…desire.”
Dialogue can be extraordinarily effective when used
to reveal aspects of character. It deepens our understanding of the characters,
making them and their story come alive in profound and wonderful ways. Yet, it is seldom nearly so effective when employed to deliver exposition. And nothing does
more to impede the natural forward momentum of a story than the clunky, heavy-handed use of
expository dialogue—putting information in the mouths of characters that could
better have been related through narrative. It’s like tripping on a tree root
along a trail, having to pick oneself up and double back in order to move
forward. No fun at all!
Perhaps the best way to ensure smooth pacing is
to master the flow of language, the art of the elegantly imperceptible
transition from phrase to phrase, sentence to sentence, paragraph to paragraph.
The last sentence of a paragraph ideally throws a switch, as on a railroad, effortlessly conveying
readers into the next paragraph, and so on, to the end. If this series of
switches is working smoothly and in precise concert, the story’s pacing will
seem natural, vibrant, and, most importantly, inevitable. If the switches are too
slow to open, or somehow out of alignment, the pace will appear to drag as the
reader must negotiate gaps, drop-offs, fits and starts, between sections.
In the end, Rose’s request for re-writes got me to
think deeply about my craft, and that was well worth the time it took to do the
work. By making careful cuts to parts of Dorian's "story within a story", while adding steamy stage business at strategic points along the way, I managed to bring the new erotically supercharged version of A Polite Fiction in at just under 3,000 words. In my e-mail with the revised story, I wrote:
OK, after five full and extremely intense days, I think I’ve done all I can to this story—any more would very probably end up causing damage. A Polite Fiction may never succeed in turning readers into quivering puddles of inarticulate lust, but the eroticism has definitely been kicked up a notch or two, and, I believe, for those who can get past any hang-ups about May-December nookie, it will work very well indeed.
I hope it works for you, too!
OK, after five full and extremely intense days, I think I’ve done all I can to this story—any more would very probably end up causing damage. A Polite Fiction may never succeed in turning readers into quivering puddles of inarticulate lust, but the eroticism has definitely been kicked up a notch or two, and, I believe, for those who can get past any hang-ups about May-December nookie, it will work very well indeed.
I hope it works for you, too!
No comments:
Post a Comment